Although political discourse often frames Roe v. Wade in terms of women’s reproductive rights, the famous 1973 ruling has nothing to do with women’s rights.
Pro-choice intellectuals and activists use any one of three scientifically-implausible arguments to support their view that Roe v. Wade protects women. Each argument involves an errant perspective on the unborn being inside of a woman’s womb.
To read the rest of the article, originally published at the Daily Caller, click here.
Never miss a post! Have all new posts delivered straight to your inbox.
There are no comments yet, but you can be first to comment this article.